Emptying Your
Salt Shaker
By TOM HEUER |
|
|
|
|
|
We often tell the groups we're facilitating or
the executives we're coaching that Leadership is not a spectator
sport. Standing on the sidelines watching while your people engage
the customer or wrestle with an important problem is not what leaders
do. They struggle right along with them. Being in the middle of
the fray is where leaders are most comfortable. But, this advice
usually falls on deaf ears because many senior managers are more
concerned about giving orders or admiring their stock options or
covering their butts. John LeCarre offers this warning to managers,
"Your office is a dangerous place to view the world from."
There comes a point in time that managers must become leaders, And
this means that they will have to become more involved with their
people.
Becky Pippert made a great observation some years
ago when she wrote in her classic book, Out of the Salt Shaker
and Into the World. She said, "Unless the salt gets shaken
out of the salt shaker and onto something, it remains a mere table
ornament." This is a very good description of numerous business
executives. They may have a high potency but they keep it enclosed
in the salt shaker. They are never rubbing up against the people
they need to affect, so their lives remain potentially powerful
but ineffective. These business executives have chosen the path
of using people as objects. They will let their light shine only
when it benefits them. All managers need to radiate their light
so others can learn from their experience. It is your role; it is
the most valuable part of your day.
So, how is it that some managers can open up their
salt shakers and let the seasoning flow? Why do some business executives
understand the value of placing their light up on a stand for employees
to see it? Why do some managers have energy to become leaders and
become actively involved with their staff? It may be attributed
to this "Equation for Leadership:
(HP + CP + CC = MI)
HP refers to high potency, CP stands for close
proximity and CC calls for clear communication. What does HP plus
CP plus CC mean in relation to one's leadership? Why is "impact"
the focus for all leaders? Why will "maximum impact" occur
if these three leadership activities are placed on a high priority?
High potency assures strength and credibility.
It has "real power" to influence change. It possesses
the character to move its subject beyond its current state. High
potency will always affect movement. It sucks the negative out and
replaces it with the right stuff. High potency encourages boldness
and innovation in its work. It spices things up! High potency puts
"the wow" in an ordinary world. But, high potency in leaders
requires preparation, effort and commitment.
Consider salt! If it is highly potent, salt has
an awesome affect. Salt makes you thirsty. Think about the items
served at a restaurant or bar - peanuts, chips and pretzels. Salty
items cause more thirst and ultimately brings you to drink more.
Salt also improves the flavor of food. Think about steak and seasoned
salt - what a combination. Or a fresh ear of corn without salt?
No way. Salt preserves food items. Properly packed in salt, foods
can be preserved for long periods of time. So it is with leaders.
It's high potency that gives leaders the confidence to teach, coach
and support their employees. It is this spirit that moves the leader
from a selfish, me-motivated individual to an outward-focused person
always thinking about the needs of employees and customers. Developing
and keeping high potency is a life-long endeavor.
For high potency to have an impact, the leader
must "let it out of the salt shaker." Why work hard to
develop high potency and leave it in the can? Close proximity
is an important leadership variable your people need from you. Your
ability to respond appropriately to important issues or provide
critical coaching points happens due to your involvement. The leader's
intimacy allows his/her skills to become a factor in the company's
success. It brings spirit to the depths of organizations. Proximity
says that "I care about you professionally and personally."
And people will respond by working hard for you.
George W. Bush is a trend-setter in "shoulder
rubbing." Since 9/11, he has been in close proximity with his
constituency. He has provided support to the people of New York
City; he has brought encouragement to the police and fire departments
around the country; he has stood tall with our troops and their
families; he has worked closely with the Congress to gain the resources
needed to battle the opponent; and he has met personally with world
leaders to rally their support. Bush's close proximity has given
him great credibility with the American people and raised his level
of potency with them.
So, why is it that many leaders fear close proximity?
Some executives have not completed the heavy lifting work to build
"high potency." They are not comfortable being actively
involved with their people. Some managers do not believe that active
involvement with employees will make a difference. Just ask the
New York Yankees about their leader, Joe Torre. His close association
and commitment to his players motivated them to achieve at world
championship levels. Some individuals are so enamored with the numbers
that close proximity does not come on the "radar screen."
People are not important to them. Others believe that close proximity
is the responsibility of their front line supervisors. And others
are attached to the comfortable confines of their office and with
the lure of meetings. Changing is not an avenue for them.
Without close proximity, executives will keep
wondering why people are not engaged. Results will dip below expectations
and customers may be satisfied but not loyal. The senior team will
be constantly searching for strategies and tactics to achieve stakeholder
expectations. Step back - it is right in front of you. Get involved.
Let the salt out of the shaker.
Finally, to gain maximum impact, executives must
offer clear communications. In most companies, when "there
is a mist in the ivory tower, there is fog on main street."
This is generally caused by managers not providing clarity. Employees
are indecisive and lack confidence when expectations and directions
are unclear. Anxiety, fear and hesitation occurs in uncertain situations.
The momentum slows as employees wait for clarification. They are
just waiting for "the boss" to step in and take the confusion
out of the situation. Unfortunately, many executives are not blessed
with the skills and patience to communicate clearly with a variety
of constituents.
To work effectively in close proximity, listening
is the most valuable and meaningful asset for leaders. Listening
is the magnet that attracts employees to your potency. Clarity depends
on your desire to listen first and foremost. Listening builds effective
relationships. It serves others. For maximum impact, executives
lead with their ears and follow up with their tongues. Listening
communicates that someone is of great worth and value. Listening
seeks to understand so the proper responses can be made. Listening
gives you credibility and fosters respect. It is the primary factor
in lifting the dense, fog bank.
Leaders find numerous methods and opportunities
to communicate. E-mail, voice mail, teleconference, town hall meetings,
etc. are the tools to communicate with. However, the approach is
secondary to being clear about your message. For your potency and
proximity to have maximum impact, the message must be understood.
Leaders need to devote more time and energy in delivering clear
and concise messages to its target audiences. And even just as important,
don't let go of the message until you know it to be fully understood.
Kirk Douglas, the 85 year-old actor, has struggled
with clear communications since his debilitating stroke in 1996.
In his latest book, My Stroke of Luck, Douglas confirms that
the serious illness robbed him of his speech and left him in deep
depression. "All I could do was babble." He couldn't stop
thinking about not being able to speak. "I'm an actor who can't
talk - what does he do? Wait for silent pictures to make a comeback?"
Douglas credits the high potency of his wife with
speeding the recovery. "She was very helpful because she believes
in tough love," he says. "When I said things like I wanted
breakfast in bed in the morning, she would ask me if I was planning
to sleep in the kitchen." She opened the salt shaker and let
the seasoning flow. "I listened to her," claimed Douglas.
He still has difficulty communicating; but, with his charisma and
energy for life (high potency), people are grasping onto every word
he has to say. And he is spending more time involved with impacting
people.
So, what is the message for leaders? The business
climate today is uncertain due to the economic environment, the
Enron situation and the pace of work. More leaders are needed today
who have an unbridled determination to make an impact. To accomplish
this, you must develop your potency, commit to close proximity and
provide clear communications. Practice showering your leadership
and flavoring people with your inspiration and energy. The payoff
is enormous for you and the organization.
Copyright 2002 International Leadership Associates
|